False Flag PSYOP, Obot, and Logical Fallacy Agents

Good stuff at The Steady Drip.




Filed under Idea War, PSYOP

7 responses to “False Flag PSYOP, Obot, and Logical Fallacy Agents

  1. http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/05/please-get-this-straight-aka-obama.html

    Embedded links at source:

    Please get this straight:

    Hawaiian officials have not validated AKA OBAMA’s place of birth. What they have said is that they “have the original document” on file. They haven’t offered a clue as to what information is in that document nor have they said what kind of birth certificate is on file; a conventional birth certificate issued by a hospital with a doctor’s signature or the kind of birth certificate issued by Hawaii on the basis of an affidavit? The Hawaiian officials are not part of a cover-up. They can not legally validate what is on that document without a court order or permission from “our” Chicago con-man.

    Laws of the Territory of Hawaii ACT 96 To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth was in effect from 1911 until 1972 and allowed someone who was born outside the Hawaiian Islands to be registered as though he were born in Hawaii. Under that law, someone simply would have presented herself to the Hawaiian authorities and declared that the child was born in Hawaii. The person could have sworn under oath and presented witnesses and other evidence. If the authorities accepted it, that was the end of it. All a person had to do was file a false statement and Hawaii took them at their word.

    One could not just say “My kid was born in Des Moines but I want him to have a Hawaiian birth record”. But if you lied no investigation was conducted to validate your claim and the Hawaiian birth record was issued no questions asked.

    Knowledge of this practice was wide spread and there are probably thousands of people who obtained Hawaiian birth records between 1911 and 1972 through the process of affidavits and witnesses rather than hospitals and delivery doctors.

    One high profile example of the Hawaiian birth certificate policy is the former Emperor of China. Sun Yat-sen was born on 12 November 1866 to a peasant family in the village of Cuiheng, China, but by 1904 he had a Hawaiian birth certificate and was officially a citizen of the United States. The wording on Sun Yat-sen’s Hawaiian birth certificate reveals that at age 18 he “made application for a Certificate of Birth. And that it appears from his affidavit and the evidence submitted by witnesses that he was born in the Hawaiian Islands.” Appears? It also appears that AKA Obama was born in Hawaii. Does the AKA Obama birth certificate on file with the State of Hawaii have language similar to the birth certificate of SunYat-sen?

    The only way to know where AKA OBAMA was actually born is to view AKA OBAMA’s original birth certificate on file in Hawaii to see what kind of birth certificate it is, and to examine what corroborating evidence supports what it says about AKA OBAMA’s alleged place of birth. If the birth was in a hospital, as AKA OBAMA has maintained, such evidence would be the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor who delivered him.
    The records of hospitals in Hawaii have been searched and there is no record of Stanley Ann Obama ever having given birth to a child. In a November 2004 interview with the Rainbow Newsletter, Maya Soetoro told reporters her half-brother Sen. Barack Obama was born on Aug. 4, 1961, at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu. After it was concluded that Obama and his mother were never there in February 2008, Maya told reporters for the Honolulu Star-Bulletin that Obama was at the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children. Obama and Mom were never there.

    Which is most likely?
    AKA Obama is hiding a conventional birth certificate issued by a hospital and signed by a doctor?
    AKA Obama is hiding a birth certificate attested to by witnesses with no hospital or doctor mentioned?

    The Certification of Live Birth that was published on AKA OBAMA’s campaign web site is not a Birth Certificate. It is easy to tell the difference between the two types of documents. It is very likely that the COLB used by AKA OBAMA’s campaign is a fraudulent document. Several forensic document examiners have carefully scrutinized the COLB and declared it suspicious or an obvious forgery. The best evidence presented so far is from Ron Polarik, PhD.

    Dr. Polarik writes: “There are laws on the books in Hawaii and the Federal Statutes that clearly spell out exactly what constitutes forgery, and in both Hawaii State Law and the Federal Statutes, the act of altering an official government document — even if it is just a facsimile of that document — constitutes forgery. The bogus COLB that Obama created is also considered to be a “false identification document, a felony forgery.” Dr. Polarik’s evidence is preserved online. There is also a YouTube video summary of the evidence.

    Forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines, a Former Federal Examiner with a long history of expert testimony in state and federal courts, has testified in an affidavit that states, in part:

    After reviewing Dr. Polarik’s analysis, Sandra Lines says, “I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Dr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.” Sandra Ramsey Lines summary is posted at U. S. Law Blog.


    • There doesn’t appear to be much stomach for pursuing proof of the current incumbent’s eligibility to hold the office.
      All who raise the issue are marginalized, demonized and ridiculed. To dispute his right to rule is racist, sexist, homophobic and politically incorrect.
      Psychological intimidation suppresses the asking of unwelcome questions.

      Supposing it can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was born in Kenya, then what?

      • I still have hopes for the SCOTUS and the Grand Jury movement.

        See: Pouring Oil on Troubled Waters


      • I was over there, but don’t want to pollute your comments section with views that may later be used against you in court.

        I think stringing up a handful of the most egregrious violators of the public trust would clarify the thinking of the survivors. The fates of Mussolini and Ceausescu should never be forgotten by those who seek power over a free people.

        Il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un politicien pour encourager les autres, n’est-ce pas?

        Would such acts of violence destroy whatever claim to legitimacy the perpetrators ever had? Quite possibly. That would all depend on how the incident was spun; on what narrative describing the “lynch mob” / “exasperated Patriots” was allowed to seep into the Public Consciousness and become Generally Accepted as the Conventional Wisdom.

        It’s all about a crisis of legitimacy.

        Those who question the President’s eligibility to hold the office are Legitimacy Deniers, and targeted for the same treatment as Holocaust Deniers and Climate Change Deniers.

        Before the General Population of dumbed down, public school-indoctrinated Oprah watchers can accept the legitimacy of the Grand Jury Movement, they must be reached, reeducated and deprogrammed.

        How do you propose to do that?

  2. Keep on keeping on.

    I think you probably already know that more people now get their news from the Internet than from other traditional sources.

    Much of the information about these matters has gone viral.

    Here are links to two article that have been re-published on over 100 websites and each of them has an estimated readership of more than a million.



    I see momentum on the issue of AKA Obama’s eligibility. It is not going away it is growing.

  3. Personal History of a Birther

    How about a little personal history for what is behind me being a “birther”

    I read the “Warren Report” and I believe that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone gunman.

    I have never seen a flying saucer, even though I am a pilot and an air traffic control man.

    I don’t believe that “Big Foot” exists.

    I think Islamic terrorists took down the World Trade Center.

    I don’t believe FEMA is planning to round up citizens and put them in concentration camps, and I don’t think swine flu is an international conspiracy.

    The Lock Ness Monster is a fantasy.

    I am certain that the Apollo mission actually went to the moon.

    There are no more missing aircraft and ships in the so called “Bermuda Triangle” than in any other part of the earth with equivalent traffic.

    After having reviewed the REAL science, I am convinced that Global Warming is a huge scam.

    I have a PhD, and am in private practice as a psychotherapist, so more than likely I am not crazy.

    Psychology today verification here: http://www.therapists.psychologytoday.com/rms/verification.php?id=63156

    I am a life time member of Mensa, so I am not stupid. Membership # 1061487

    The guiding principles for my professional research for articles and books I write are the usual protocols of epistemology, scientific methodology, and rules of logic and the rules of evidence.

    However, I am firmly convinced that AKA Obama is not eligible to be POTUS, and here is why:

    If you read the articles at the link, and review the citations at the embedded links, you will be “literate” about the facts of the “eligibility” story and will be able to inform the public objectively.

    AKA Obama Fans: All together now – say OMG!!